Liz Treadwell HeroX team
Nov. 21, 2018
10:07 a.m. PST

Welcome to IARPA’s CASE Challenge Community Forum!

Thank you for joining our CASE Challenge Community Forum! If you take the time to read this short document and adhere to its precepts, you can get the most out of our experience together.
The CASE Challenge Community Forum (“Forum”) has been set up as a channel to help people find answers, solve problems, and stay up to date with the CASE Challenge updates.

By participating in the Forum, you are agreeing to the following Rules of Participation, the Terms of Use, and any other terms included by IARPA on the Forum. If you don't accept these Rules of Participation, the Terms of Use, and any other terms, you are not allowed to use this Forum.
These rules are your guide to getting the most out of the CASE Challenge Community.

Community administrators and moderators will enforce the Rules of Participation and the Terms of Use at their discretion. IARPA or HeroX may, at their discretion, modify the Rules of Participation.

If you recognize any violation of these rules, you’d be doing us and all community members a great favor by contacting us directly at:


To ensure a safe and productive Forum, we ask that you observe these Forum rules:

1. Be respectful. Respect your fellow users by keeping your tone positive and your comments constructive. Good or bad, your experiences are always welcome if offered in a courteous way. People like helping those who ask good questions

2. Be relevant. Make sure your contributions are relevant to this Forum and to the specific category or board where you post. If you have a new question, start a new thread rather than rather than posting in the middle of a different discussion, where your comment may be lost. Solicitations inviting members to join, participate in, or buy something, are never relevant.

3. Obey the law and keep your word. Don't post anything that would violate any law, or any contractual agreement that you have made.

4. Protect privacy - Don't share anything about yourself that you would not want others to see. Don't post contact or other personal information - your own or anyone else's - or any content that you receive in one-to-one communications without the author's consent.

5. Remember this is user-generated content. You'll find plenty of good advice here but remember that your situation or use may vary from that of the individual sharing a solution.

6. Think before you post. You may not use, or allow others to use, your registration membership to post or transmit:
a. "Rants", "Slams", or legal threats against IARPA, the U.S. Government, or another company or any person.
b. Offensive content such as personally attacking, calling names, or otherwise harassing or being condescending to any other person, ethnic, or religious group
c. Political statements or commentary.
d. Off-topic comments not related to a technical or usage issue regarding the CASE Challenge
e. Language that promotes illegal activity or discusses illegal activities with the intent to commit them, encourage others to do so, or teach others how to do so.
f. Duplicate posts.
g. Hyperlinks that lead to sites that violate any of the Forum guidelines.
h. Any message that solicits or promotes the use of an illegal substance.
i. Post “spam” linking to outside sites that are not related to CASE Challenge and/or ongoing discussions. This includes your profile content.
j. Posting adult-oriented or sexually explicit content or images.

7. We will try to remove objectionable content in a reasonable time. We reserve the right to remove any content and/or post without providing a reason.

8. Cooperate with Forum Moderators and Administrators. Please cooperate and take heed and direction from forum moderators when given, they are here to make the community environment a better place.
3 Replies

Matt Kaufman
Dec. 3, 2018
8:10 a.m. PST
Hello Liz,

I am excited to register today for the ODNI IARPA CASE Challenge; I believe that an ontology and self-proving business logic may be important in the development of a novel and creative method for accurately accessing the state and accuracy (logic) of a credability assessment; whether it is in historical, real-time or future.

Interested in applications across government, academia and primarily industry, especially in counter-intelligence, business intelligence & or early/anticipatory opportunity and intelligence + trust detection.

My company, MI2 HOLDINGS LLC and DIG (Document Interest Group) has been working in this area since 2014.

Charla M. Burnett
Dec. 4, 2018
7:48 a.m. PST
Hello Liz and Matt,

I'm also very pleased to register today. My work has predominately focused on credibility assessments for public participatory geographic information systems and to collect information in real time and not post-hoc that is useful to policymakers. The assessment is built upon many theories including game theory, negotiation theory, and structuration theory. I'm interested learning more about this in the private sector (i.e., Business Intelligence). My work is heavily embedded in the rights of marginalized and indigenous peoples. The view that a person is or an evaluation is "credible" rests on individual values, beliefs, and experiences, not on actual facts. As a result, to be perceived as credible (having the power to deceive other's thoughts of credibility) does not actually mean the person or evaluation is actually credible.

I come from the public sector as a certified mediator who works to rebuild credibility between communities and their governments. There's a "real" need for credibility but I argue we must question whether these novel approaches allow the powerful to manipulate and build a false credibility and not actually address our collective reality/security. I look forward to having these discussions and participating in this process.

Please let me know if I can ever be help to anyone. This is my life's passion and will be working in this field well beyond this competition.

Robert Holmes
Dec. 7, 2018
7:04 p.m. PST
I want to help though I am unclear as to whether we're talking about individuals and what they say in person or what they write. Facebook has become riddled with information that fails to list reference to where the author got their information.
Post Your Reply