Here is an example of how you can outline the Guidelines section of your HeroX page
Once you have completed your judging criteria, you can begin constructing your submission form on your HeroX page dashboard. This will be what competitors fill out to submit their idea so you want to ensure it is clear and concise. The easiest way to start building your form is to take the judging criteria and ask discrete questions based off of that criteria.
Using Operation Blue Sky: Aboriginal Health Initiative as an example, this is how you would construct the submission form based on that criteria:
|Submission Evaluation Criteria||Submission Form Question|
|Culturally appropriate and inclusive||How is your solution culturally appropriate and inclusive to Aboriginal Canadians?|
|Relevance to Aboriginal people in First Nations and traditional territories||How does your solution apply to the current state of Aboriginal people across various territories?|
|Flexible||Describe how your solution could be altered to fit the different territories and tribes.|
|Action-oriented, pragmatic and sustainable||Describe the practicality of your solution and how it will work for all tribes indefinitely.|
|Ability to exist within current legislative and fiscal environments||How does your solution fit in with the current legislation and other government environments?|
|Cost neutral||Outline how your solution would be cost neutral.|
|General appearance, intangibles, ‘Wow’ factor||(Note: this wouldn’t be a question but where the competitor can attach a file - PDF, video link, etc. - to demonstrate this criteria)|
Some crowdsourcing sponsors simplify their submission form by having competitors only upload a PDF (or other text file) of their solution.
You also have the option of making some of your form questions required or optional.
For a competition to be fair and effective, it must include clear and complete criteria for the winning solution. Clear criteria help everyone compete on a level playing field and avoid any possible need to change them mid-competition. By choosing parameters to measure and a way to measure them, you can create a fair and clear way to identify the winner. This will vary whether your competition will award the first to cross a finish line or the best overall.
For example, if the goal is to improve math and science education, what is the measure of improvement? How many students must show what sort of change? You will need to turn many different measurement knobs to get the right mix of requirements giving you and your competitors a clear goal. Of course, these measurements are related to the audaciousness of your project and must be clearly part of the rules for the competition.
Your final scorecard should look something like this (example also taken from Operation Blue Sky: Aboriginal Health Initiative):
|Submission Evaluation Criteria||Maximum Points Award|
Culturally appropriate and inclusive
|Relevance to Aboriginal people in First Nations and traditional territories||20|
|Action-oriented, pragmatic and sustainable||10|
|Ability to exist within current legislative and fiscal environments||10|
|General appearance, intangibles, ‘Wow’ factor||15|
Another suggestion to ensure you receive high-quality submissions is to provide tips and examples of what you are (or aren't) looking for. You can view examples of this here.
Award or Prize Amount
Choosing an award amount is a bit of a science. Try to figure out how much an individual or team might spend (time or actual money) to win the prize, or think about how much the solution is worth to you. The intellectual property (IP) structure you decide on can also impact the prize. If you wish to own all of the IP of the winning solution, you will want to award a higher prize amount compared to if you allow the winning individual to keep all of the IP or share it with you.
Also important: be sure to outline consolation prizes in case none of the solutions submitted meet the criteria you outlined. Even if you don't award the full prize amount, competitors can trust that their hard work will not "go to waste", and they will be aware ahead of time that there's a contingency plan in the event no one solves your problem or achieves your goal.
Choosing a Winner
There are a couple of ways that you can choose your winner. Some prizes are “first to finish,” and others utilize the “best in class” approach”. “First to finish” is when the team that meets the prize requirements first, wins. “Best in class” is when all qualified competitors compete at the same time and the best performers in each “class” win.
These two prize types incentivize competition and define success differently. As you design your prize, you need to decide what type of prize will work best. Here are some of the questions to think about as you decide what type of prize you are designing:
Depending on the amount of prize money you have, you could have multiple awards rather than just one lump sum. For instance, the Clinical Trial Innovation Prize had a first place prize and a second place prize that were selected by the judges. They also had a third “People’s Choice” award that was selected by the crowd! Voting is another great way to get the public involved in your crowdsourcing project or competition. However, you will want to take into consideration the potential technicality of the submissions people would be voting on. The more specialized it is, the more you will want to restrict or reconsider the ability to vote.
The HeroX platform has the capability to allow the crowd (or a limited group of people) cast a vote for their favorite entry. Depending on the project or competition you are designing, you can opt to have the crowd vote for a certain number of submissions to move on to a semi-finalist or finalist round, pick a “People’s Choice” winner, or even select your overall prize winner.
Your competition guidelines must be clear and specific about who can compete. Some competitions require the participants be over a certain age, some require entries by teams and not individuals, some are only for college students, and some restrict the competitors’ country.
Restrictions on eligibility may depend on your ability to award prize money to certain individuals, nations, organizations, or their ability to self-insure during the competition. For global projects or competitions, be sure you have rules in place to address this - same goes for if you are excluding certain countries or jurisdictions. If it's related to a highly regulated space, make sure you address this and outline any possible steps a competitor would need to take to operate legally within it.
Limiting competition can also be a way to shine a light on a particular demographic through your focus; a competition limited to high school students produces different results and marketing opportunities than a competition open to all ages. Also, for example, if the competition requires a driver’s license, be sure that is included in your requirements; you wouldn’t want to have to disqualify an otherwise great team just because they didn’t have a driver.
This section can include mandatory or optional rules. Here is some example language that you could use: