menu

Submission

submission voting
voting is closed.
introduction
title
Google for Electronic Health Records
short description
CTcue matches hospitals patient data with clinical trial criteria providing insights and alerts about eligible patients
Eligibility
Barriers
Physicians are unable to give an accurate feasibility count or actively search for eligible patients for a clinical trial. Since most valuable patient information is archived as text (clinical notes, transfer notes, multi-disciplinary meeting notes, discharge letters, etc.) into the EHR system, it is not possible to search these criteria except perhaps for a broad diagnosis category such as pulmonary carcinoma, while patient disease profiles are way more complex. CTcue has the state-of-the-art technology that the healthcare institutes are missing. Our matching engine can match these factors with detailed in- and exclusion criteria.
Provide link to a source describing the barrier
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3243166/
Provide link to a source describing the barrier
http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/9/1/2
What is your proposed solution to addressing the barriers?
What is your proposed solution to addressing the barriers_CTcue.pdf
What are potential obstacles to your solution? How will you work around these roadblocks?
The first roadblock concerns patient privacy. Since we only access the pseudonymised data within the hospitals firewall, no patient data leaves the hospital, ensuring that our processes are in line with the privacy laws. Providing the EHR data is the second obstacle. We consider the EHR to be a collection of medical terminologies and we search this for medical terms, sentences and relevant text snippets to reach a conclusion about the patient profile. Our system does not need exact mapping to the patient database. Access to pseudonymised data at the hospitals remains a priority and challenge, which we overcome by increasing adoption.
What % increase in accrual rates do you anticipate?
We focus on at least doubling the accrual rates. Based on research using just an alert showed an improvement of 2.5 fold compared to conventional methods. As mentioned before this process is far from being an optimal solution. Many physicians find the task of patient recruitment very cumbersome and are unable to find and recruit all eligible patients. We aim to reduce the clinician’s workload, by allowing continuous insights to eligible patients, thereby improving the patient recruitment process. Of note, clinicians will be able to assess the effectiveness of our solution from the instance CTcue is integrated into their system.
How do you anticipate maintaining the % increase in accrual rates over time?
We will continue to focus on making a faster and simpler selection process of eligible patients. The accrual rates will increase over time, since it heavily relies on adoption rate at hospitals worldwide.
How will you overcome legal/regulatory hurdles, if any?
Privacy and security of patient data is an important issue, and we have done our utmost to overcome such hurdles. It remains a challenge to obtain a unified consensus on patient record privacy and big data use in clinical medicine. From the start CTcue has been working with an experienced legal team on the topic of privacy and security of patient data.
Why hasn’t your proposed solution been tried before? If it has, what prevented it from succeeding?
Improved accrual rates are very important to the industry. Physicians focus on optimizing patient care, and improving the accrual rates is not on the priority list of most hospitals. EHR vendors provide search functionality on structured data, and IBM's Watson has shown promising results on stratification of unstructured data. However, these partial solutions require financial investments by hospitals and a substantial effort in integrating them with hospitals local systems. By providing a free “Google for Electronic Health Records” which facilitates physicians and the medical industry it plays a key role in establishing a healthy ecosystem in the medical industry.

comments (public)