When the path inside matters more than the surface outside, conventional coating methods fall apart.

A refinery operator in Texas once described a coating failure inside a flow component as "cancer from the inside out." The exterior looked pristine. But within the labyrinth of bends and bifurcations, the protective barrier had failed in patches. Some areas were just bare metal and others had a coating five times the intended thickness. Within months, corrosion had eaten through walls that should have lasted decades. The component had to be replaced at an enormous cost, and the failure mode was invisible until catastrophic.

This is the hidden engineering nightmare of complex internal geometries.

 

The Geometry Problem: Why Shape Changes Everything

Coating a flat panel is a solved problem. Spray it, dip it, or brush it, and gravity, surface tension, and line-of-sight all work in your favor. But introduce a 180° bend in a pipe, followed by a Y-shaped bifurcation, and suddenly things get complicated.

Inside these convoluted paths, coating materials must navigate sharp corners, flow around obstacles, and settle uniformly on surfaces that can't be seen or easily reached. The same material that behaves predictably on a test panel becomes erratic and uncontrollable when asked to cover a serpentine interior.

The problem compounds when these components range from ¼-inch diameter tubing to 6-inch manifolds. A technique that works at one scale often fails at another. Viscosity that's perfect for coating a narrow channel creates runs and sags in a wider section.

 

The Access Constraint: When You Can't See or Reach the Surface

Traditional coating processes assume access. However, inside a welded flow component with multiple branches and dead-end pockets, access becomes the primary constraint.

Consider these barriers:

  • No line-of-sight: Most internal surfaces can't be viewed during or after application
  • Physical limitations: Tools and applicators can't physically reach deep into complex assemblies
  • As-welded roughness: Internal welds create surface irregularities that trap coating material unevenly
  • Drainage paths: Excess coating has nowhere to go, pooling in low points

Many engineers discover too late that their coating specification was written for surfaces they could touch and see. The specification says nothing about how to achieve uniformity in a passage where human hands and eyes cannot go.

 

The Uniformity Challenge: Why Variation Multiplies in Complex Paths

A 20% thickness variation on a flat surface might be acceptable. But inside a flow path with multiple direction changes, that same variation becomes catastrophic. Here's why: coating behavior is path-dependent.

When coating material flows through a bend, centrifugal forces push it toward the outer radius. The inner radius gets less material. At a bifurcation, flow splits unevenly depending on downstream resistance. Material preferentially goes where flow is easier. Each geometric feature introduces its own bias, and these biases compound.

The result? Areas with no coating sit millimeters away from areas where coating is three times too thick. Both failure modes stem from the same root cause: inability to control deposition in three-dimensional space.

Surface roughness makes this worse. As-welded interiors have peaks and valleys that create local turbulence in coating flow. Material gets trapped in valleys and bridges over peaks, creating a porous, inconsistent barrier rather than a uniform protective layer.

 

What This Means in Practice

Industries that depend on flow components—chemical processing, oil and gas, power generation, water treatment—face a stark choice. They can over-engineer components with exotic alloys that resist corrosion without coatings, accepting massive cost penalties. They can accept shorter service life and plan for frequent replacement. Or they can hope that their coating process works despite having no real way to verify coverage in critical areas.

None of these options is satisfactory. The first is economically prohibitive for many applications. The second creates maintenance nightmares and increases downtime. The third is a gamble that often fails in the field.

The gap between what coatings can do on simple geometries and what they need to do inside complex assemblies represents a fundamental limitation in modern manufacturing. We can design intricate flow paths that optimize performance, but we can't reliably protect them from their operating environment.

 

Why This Matters Now

As industries push toward higher efficiency and more compact designs, flow components are becoming more geometrically complex, not less. Additive manufacturing enables shapes that were previously impossible to fabricate. These shapes inherit the coating problem in its most acute form. The ability to design increasingly sophisticated internal geometries has outpaced the ability to protect them.

Your proposed solution to this challenge could win a part of the cash prize and potentially lead to a partnership with Emerson!