menu

American-Made Program

 64,241

SOLVE IT Prize

Enabling innovative solutions for local energy-related challenges.

This challenge is closed

stage:
Winner Announcement
prize:
$5,000,000

This challenge is closed

more
Summary
Timeline
Updates13
Forum18
Teams1.2K
Entries
Resources
FAQ
Summary

Overview

The Solutions for Lasting, Viable Energy Infrastructure Technologies (SOLVE IT) Prize aims to enable local organizations to identify and implement innovative energy solutions in a way that works for their unique needs and challenges. 

Regions across the country are faced with long-standing energy challenges, including impact from heavy industry, high energy costs, aging grid infrastructure, and more. Innovative energy technologies can help address many of these challenges while providing economic, workforce, and other benefits. 

Many organizations, however, lack the resources and capacity to develop plans for local energy projects. The SOLVE IT Prize was designed to support local stakeholders and organizations as they identify and implement innovative energy solutions in a way that works best to address their unique needs and challenges. In doing so, the SOLVE IT Prize looks to promote the commercialization of promising energy technologies that will lead to reliable, affordable energy across the U.S.

The prize will award competitors with a demonstrated history of productive work with stakeholder. Competitors will work collaboratively with stakeholders interested in community-scale (neighborhood-, town-, or city-scale) planning around energy infrastructure to engage local residents and organizations, build a network of support for energy projects, and develop plans for carrying out these projects.

 

Prize Structure

Over three phases, competitors will work with their stakeholders to develop a credible path forward on energy projects that help address local challenges. 

Embark Phase: Competitors will identify a region, a local challenge facing that community that can be addressed by an energy technology solution, and a clear plan for engagement. Competitors will demonstrate that they have what it takes to carry out their project. 

Engage Phase: Teams will engage with their stakeholders to develop the vision for their future energy project.   

Establish Phase: Teams will create plans for carrying out at least one specific, technically novel energy project. Winners will demonstrate proof that they have obtained the confirmed commitments needed to carry out their projects.

 

For more information, review the official rules document.

 

The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Technology Transitions (OTT), Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED), and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) have collaborated to launch the SOLVE IT Prize. The prize is part of the American-Made program and is administered by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. SOLVE IT is funded by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) through the Technology Commercialization Fund (TCF).


Guidelines

The competition is open to individuals, nonprofits, local government entities, economic development organizations, educational institutions, and other organizations with a history of successful participatory community-based initiatives. 

Please review the official rules document for the complete application process and instructions for competing.

If you want to subscribe to updates on the prize, click the "Follow" button at the top of the page. If you have any questions, you may use the contact feature on the HeroX platform, or message us directly.

Timeline
Updates13

Challenge Updates

SOLVE IT Phase 2: Engage Winners Announced!

Dec. 19, 2024, 8:43 a.m. PST by NREL Prize Administrator

Modified March 2025 

Winners have been announced from Phase 2: Engage of the SOLVE IT Prize! The 10 winners received $150,000 each for collaborating with community stakeholders to identify energy projects that can address community priorities. 

Map

Description automatically generated

 

Congratulations to the 10 winning teams from SOLVE IT Phase 2!

  • Clearfork Valley Solar and Energy Efficiency (Clairfield, TN) – This team’s Woodland Community Land Trust decided on a solar project that will produce 1 MW of energy, create local jobs, and lower bills for residents.
  • Cooperative Energy Futures (Minneapolis, MN) - This team plans to pilot a district geothermal system, centered on an anchor building and connected to residences and buildings in the surrounding area.
  • Detroit MorningSide EcoDistrict (Detroit, MI) – This team’s Feed Your Neighborhood- Detroit Disaster Recovery Group plans to retrofit to the Grass Roots Organizing Work (GROW) House community hub with focus on solar panel installation and battery storage.
  • Duquesne Light Company – Project GREEN (Sharpsburg, PA) - This team plans to increase energy resilience for an urban greenhouse and grocery store with a solar system coupled with a waste-to-energy system.
  • Groundwork Elizabeth (Elizabeth, NJ) - Groundwork Elizabeth seeks incorporate solar and storage with geothermal to transform a community center into an energy-efficient Community Resilience Hub in Elizabeth, NJ. 
  • Hui Ulu Mea ‘Ai for the Cultivation of Community Self-Reliance (Waiāhole, HI) - This team plans to develop a micro-hydropower system in Waiāhole Valley on the island of Oʻahu, Hawaiʻi to enable resilience in this rural community.
  • Puerto Rico Hydro Microgrid Partners (Utuado Municipio, PR) - This team plans to innovatively improve community resiliency with small hydroelectric powered microgrids for low-resourced, rural communities in Puerto Rico.
  • Salish Kootenai Energy Alliance (Pablo, MT) - This team’s project is a collaboration of tribal government, business, and non-profit leaders working to meet energy needs of the Flathead Indian Reservation.
  • SDSU & Torres Martinez Collaborative (Thermal, CA) - This team’s collaboration will facilitate the energy sovereignty of the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians with solar-powered microgrids.
  • Town of Pennington Gap (Pennington Gap, VA) - This team’s project plans to develop solar with EV charging to address key community priorities, reduce costs, enhance public safety, and boost local economic resilience.

 

Read the full announcement and meet the teams on energy.gov.

 


One Week Left for SOLVE IT Prize Phase 2 Submissions

Nov. 18, 2024, 11 a.m. PST by NREL Prize Administrator

Just one week until the SOLVE IT Prize Phase 2 submission deadline on Nov 25! The 28 teams still competing need to submit all Phase 2 materials that day by 5 p.m. ET.   

Competitors, be sure to connect with the Power Connectors in the ‘Resources’ tab to get feedback and guidance on your submission!   

SOLVE IT Prize Phase 2 winners are anticipated to be announced in late December.   

Good luck, teams!   


Phase 2 Submission Deadline Nov 25

Nov. 7, 2024, 12:49 p.m. PST by NREL Prize Administrator

The Phase 2 submission deadline is approaching for the 28 teams still competing in the SOLVE IT Prize!  

Competitors must submit all Phase 2 materials by 5 p.m. ET on Nov 25.   

Pro Tip: Teams can use the Phase 2 Submission Template in the ‘Resources’ tab to make sure your submission is complete!  

The winners of Phase 2: Engage are anticipated to be announced in late December.   

Good luck to the competing teams and we look forward to seeing your submissions!  


SOLVE IT Phase 1: Embark Winners Announced

May 21, 2024, 12:59 p.m. PDT by NREL Prize Administrator

Modified March 2025 

Congratulations to the 28 winners from Phase 1: Embark of the SOLVE IT Prize! Each winner received $80,000 for describing their experience in community engagement and identifying a community seeking creative energy solutions and high-level plan to engage that community.

 

These winners now advance to Phase 2: Engage to work closely with community stakeholders to develop the community’s vision for an energy project.

 

Congratulations to the winning teams!

  • Aloha First (Waimanalo, HI) – Implementing sustainable solutions for energy justice on behalf of Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians) who have long been underserved.
  • Asociación de Residentes de La Margarita (Salinas, Puerto Rico) – Exploring an energy efficiency and resilience project using air conditioner water heater systems for La Margarita, Puerto Rico.
  • Bryant Decarbonization  (Ann Arbor, MI) – Creating a regional geothermal district by centering the goals, aspirations, and strengths of a local neighborhood.
  • City of Baltimore (Baltimore, MD) ­– Identifying innovative ways to expand EV charging in Baltimore City, creating and actionable strategy by engaging with community members. 
  • City of New Bedford, MA Resilience Hubs (New Bedford, MA) ­– Coordinating resource centers that build a community's capacity to thrive before, during, and following extreme events.
  • Clean Energy NH Energy Circuit Rider (Hampton, NH) – Implementing energy solutions for local libraries as hands-on learning opportunities for citizens to achieve their own energy saving solutions.
  • Clearfork Community Solar and Energy Efficiency (Clairfield, TN) – Convening community stakeholders to pair community solar with household energy efficiency programs to tackle energy poverty in Appalachia.
  • Comunidades del Sol (Carrizo Springs, TX) – Aiming to reduce the energy burdens of residents in Comunidades del Sol, TX.
  • Cooperative Energy Futures (Minneapolis, MN) – Developing district level ground-source heating systems centered around anchor sites, reaching surrounding homes and businesses.
  • Detroit MorningSide EcoDistrict (Detroit, MI) Making efficient upgrades to the community hub to demonstrate technologies, anchor community education, and quickly scale adoption.
  • DU BleuGreen Krewe (Orleans Parish, LA) ­– Increasing awareness and investment around innovative energy solutions in local communities surrounding Dillard University.
  • Duquesne Light Company (Sharpsburg, PA) – Helping Sharpsburg, PA achieve their goal of an independent energy future through community-led solutions.
  • East Oakland Neighborhood Initiative Collaborative (Oakland, CA) – Exploring technology-agnostic energy networks as tools for realizing accessible energy infrastructure in East Oakland.
  • Energizing Southeast Alaska (Thorne Bay, AK) ­– Working with a remote Alaskan community to rethink the use of forest products as a sustainable solution to meet energy challenges.
  • Groundwork Elizabeth & Partners (Elizabeth, NJ) – Partnering with public housing, a state university, and a non-profit to explore energy options for seniors in public housing in Elizabeth, NJ.
  • Hui Ulu Mea ʻAi for the Cultivation of Community Self-Reliance (Waiāhole, HI) – Exploring micro-hydropower in Waiāhole Valley on the island of Oʻahu to enable resilience in their rural community.
  • Just Transition Rural Innovators (Delta County, CO) - Linking decarbonization, industrial efficiencies and carbon management at an old coalmine with community energy for jobs and climate harm reduction.
  • Lowlanders for Energy Justice (Port Sulphur, LA) – Creating a sustainable, green energy solution for a disadvantaged, indigenous costal community to maintain their lifeways.
  • Michigan Tech Beaver Island Energy Resiliency Initiative (Charlevoix County, MI) ­– Supporting community priorities for a more sustainable and resilient future for the remote, rural island community.
  • Mojave Microgrid Hub (Gardnerville, NV) – Using stakeholder engagement and inclusive planning to foster economic growth, sustainability, and energy innovation.
  • Power-Up Jackson (Jackson, MS) ­­– Revitalizing West Jackson, MS with energy-efficient homes and solar panels to boost sustainability and empower residents.
  • Puerto Rico Hydro Microgrid Partners (Utuado Municipio, Puerto Rico) – Improving community resilience with small hydroelectric powered microgrids for low-resourced, rural communities in Puerto Rico.
  • Salish and Kootenai Community Energy Alliance (Ronan, MT) – Conducting community-based participatory research, outreach, and education while honoring cultural traditions.
  • San Diego State University and Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians Collaboration (Riverside County, CA) ­­– Expanding collaboration to address frequent power outages and distribution challenges in a very hot region with tribal communities. 
  • Siskiyou County Job Council (Yreka, CA) ­– Uplifting Siskiyou County's rural cities and unincorporated communities through renewable energy readiness and projects.
  • Town of Pennington Gap (Pennington Gap, VA) – Educating, supporting, and advocating for renewable energy implementation in southwest Virginia.
  • Tri-Town Rural Community-Driven Energy Planning Team (Otisfield, ME) ­– Planning for regional community-driven energy projects in three rural towns with high energy burdens & reliability issues.
  • White Frog Sustainable Solutions LLC (Lame Deer, MT) – Applying a Dynamic Assessment & Adaptive Education Model to guide community engagement, building efficiency planning, and implementation.

Read the full announcement on enery.gov.


SOLVE IT Phase 1 Winner Announcement and Virtual Event

May 16, 2024, 12:20 p.m. PDT by NREL Prize Administrator

Modified March 2025 

Thank you to all of the SOLVE IT competitors for your submissions! The Phase 1: Embark winner announcement will take place on May 21, both through the HeroX platform and as part of a virtual event that all are welcome to join.  

The livestream winner announcement event will take place next Tuesday, May 21 from 3:30-4:30 p.m. ET, followed by a conversation about support for community-scale energy projects. This virtual event will be hosted by the Offices of Technology Transitions, Clean Energy Demonstrations, and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.  

Register now to attend the livestream winner announcement and conversation: DOE SOLVE IT Prize Announcement 


Forum18
Teams1.2K
Entries
Resources
FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, but it’s quick and easy. Just click the “Solve this Challenge” button on this page and follow the instructions to complete your registration. All you need to provide is your name and email address.

The competition is open to individuals, nonprofits, local government entities, economic development organizations, educational institutions, and other organizations with a history of successful participatory community-based initiatives. Of particular focus are disadvantaged and energy-burdened communities at the neighborhood, town, and city scale.

View the Official Rules to learn more about the application process and instructions for competing.

All of your files are uploaded as part of the submission form, access this by clicking the Begin Entry/Solve This Challenge button. The submission form contains an upload option for each of the required file entries. Only PDF files will be accepted for upload.

If you encounter an issue when attempting to submit an entry to the challenge, you may need to contact HeroX or the Prize Administrator.

You may try to connect with HeroX using the online form which appears in the bottom right corner of your browser window, it says Leave a Message.

You may also send a message to the Prize Administrator inbox at SOLVEIT@nrel.gov.

Please allow at least 1 business day for a response.

If you have a question not answered in the FAQ, we recommend that you post it in the Forum where someone will respond to you. This way, others who may have the same question will be able to see it.

You can also email us at SOLVEIT@nrel.gov.

Are there specific technologies/companies that would be preferred for deployment that have been a part of the technology research conducted by OTT, OCED, and EERE? Or can the applicant work with a local clean energy startup of their choice?

Teams are welcome to work with whichever companies/startups that make sense for their community clean energy challenges/opportunities. Please refer to pages 8-9 of the prizes rules to confirm technology eligibility. 

Are Native Tribes eligible?

Yes.

Should the technology be deployed at homes? Or are commercial applications ok too?

The SOLVE IT prize intends to support clean energy solutions at the neighborhood, town, and city scales. The competitor can determine the best solution for their specific community’s needs. 

Do you have to be awarded the first two phases in order to qualify for phase 3?

Yes, only the winners of Phase 1 will advance to Phase 2; only the winners of Phase 2 will advance to Phase 3.

Can the Prize funds be put towards a facility that will be used to carry out the strategy (working with the community stakeholders), purchasing equipment needed for the technology?

Prize funds can be used however the winning team chooses.

How important is the past track record of the applicant?

Phase 1: Embark submissions are scored based on three criteria. Criterion 1 is Experience, which accounts for 40% of the total submission score, and includes an assessment of the competitor’s track record of working with communities.

Is the cash prize used to fund the execution initiative?

Prize funds can be used however the winning team chooses.

Does a technology that reduces energy use qualify? In this instance it is a water sustainability technology focused on precision irrigation in agriculture.

Section 1.4 of the official rules document includes a list of areas of interest for this prize. The SOLVE IT Power Connectors can provide further guidance to individual competitors. Note that identifying a single specific technology is not part of the Phase 1: Embark submission. The prize aims to support communities as they identify and implement innovative solutions in a way that addresses their unique needs and challenges.

Is the identified community to be involved from the Embark phase as partner or not?

The competitor may determine which partners to include in their team; they are not required to include a specific member of the identified community in their Embark submission.

If the team had a funded project that addresses clean energy for a community, can they still submit?

Yes. Teams are encouraged to ensure their SOLVE IT submissions align with the goals of this particular prize.  The prize aims to support communities as they identify and implement innovative solutions in a way that addresses their unique needs and challenges.

Would an affordable housing nonprofit that has built a net-zero apt. building qualify if it paired itself with a national laboratory to further develop net-zero construction materials for affordable housing developments in Chicago?

Section 1.3 of the official rules document includes eligibility information, which competitors should use to determine their eligibility. Power Connectors can also engage in discussions about specific competitor situations. Competitors should review the rules document in full to ensure that their submission aligns with the goals of the prize. The prize aims to support communities as they identify and implement innovative solutions in a way that addresses their unique needs and challenges.

Some technologies may be taking off in the market in some places, but would be considered novel in others. For example, residential energy storage is common in CA but uptake is almost nonexistent in NYC. Would projects including these technologies not be considered "innovative," even if they are completely new to our EJ community?

Competitors should demonstrate why this specific project would be innovative. Examples of how a particular solution might be innovative or technically novel include innovative applications of the technology, uniqueness of size or scale, or novel combinations of technologies. Note that competitors are not required to identify a single specific technology at the Embark phase. In later phases, submissions will be assessed on how the proposed project may benefit this particular technology or approach (such as through novel lessons learned, replicability, etc.).

Can we tie the project into a future larger FOA scenario, particularly alternative fueling station development funding associated to creating fueling network to support mid-HD class refueling operations, pending this technology supports both securing those assets as well as providing security of GHG reductions?

Competitors are encouraged to consider future opportunities to continue to build upon the projects they are initiating due to the SOLVE IT prize, so long as their submissions align with SOLVE IT’s goals and criteria for that phase of the competition. The SOLVE IT prize team is not able to advise individual prize competitors; competitors may discuss their specific eligibility for SOLVE IT with Power Connectors. 

Are these details for the weighted scores available?

Yes, Section 3.6 of the official rules document describes the Phase 1: Embark assessment criteria and their associated weights.

Is there a page limit or word limit? Is there a specific font requirement?

There is no page limit, only a word limit. The Phase 1 submission narrative must not exceed 2,000 words. There is no font requirement other than ensuring the narrative is clear and readable.

Does this have to be a new project or can one use an existing project?

The competitor can choose a new or existing project. Note that in Phase 2: Engage submissions, competitors should describe the different technology solutions considered and feedback from communities on these varied solutions. Teams are encouraged to ensure their projects align with the prize goals. The prize aims to support communities as they identify and implement innovative solutions in a way that addresses their unique needs and challenges.

Is a single enterprise considered eligible to apply?

See Section 1.3 of the rules for eligibility. In Phase 1, a team can include a single organization or individual.

Can you describe how you would define a "binding commitment" for a project in Phase 3?

Section 5.5.5 of the official rules document describes this in further depth, including examples. A binding commitment should demonstrate firm commitment to carrying out a technically novel clean energy project in the near-term. Submitted commitments should be demonstrated through the strongest possible documentation that the competitor can provide. 

Ideally how many people are on a team?

There are no requirements for the number of members on a team. However, DOE expects that the partnering team will increase in size in Phases 2 and 3 as support grows. 

Are there any specific projects that the prize is looking for?

Section 1.4 of the prize rules list the particular areas of interest for DOE. 

I understand that Phases 1-3 will span 2024/2025. Will there be another iteration of the SOLVE IT Prize that will span 2025/2026?

At this time there is no formal announcement regarding another iteration of the SOLVE IT Prize. However, competitors are encouraged to follow www.americanmadechallenges.org as new prize opportunities are made available regularly.

Can we have a short phone call to discuss the fit of our project?

Competitors are encouraged to reach out to Power Connectors for free discussion of projects, eligibility, and fit.

To clarify, Phase 2 winners need to conduct robust community engagement to inform a credible plan toward a specific novel clean energy project, and then they get $500K to carry out that plan? So, we should be submitting ideas for projects that can be achieved with $500K? (May limit the size of the project to a single building rather than a community program.)

$500k does not need to be the limit of budget and scope for the project. The prize awards are meant to support community initiatives as they progress and garner further support in whatever way makes most sense for that community and their challenges/opportunities.

In the case of an Academic Institution, considering the campus as the community, the team can be composed of different units within the university or the team needs to involve other eligible entities not affiliated to the institution?

It is up to the competitor to define their community and their team, and any team members’ or partners’ connections to that community.

If you have been a competitor on other prizes (including whether or not you received a prize) does that have any weight in the selection process?

No. However competitors are encouraged to ensure their SOLVE IT Prize submissions align with the stated goals of this prize competition.  Details on how submissions are scored and assessed, as well as other factors that DOE may consider as part of the selection process, are included in the rules.

Can "community" be defined to mean a single multifamily building in a dense urban environment?

The target community may be defined by the competitor.

Can we work with multiple communities with this Prize?

Competitors may make one submission as the team lead, but may participate as part of the team on multiple submissions Part of the submission narrative for Phase 1: Embark is to “clearly define the community you are focusing on and describe your relationship to that community”.

Should the submission be technology based or a program/initiative?

SOLVE IT looks to award competitors who will work collaboratively with stakeholders interested in community-scale clean energy strategic planning to engage their communities, build a network of support for clean energy or decarbonization projects, and develop plans for carrying these projects out. The prize is not intended to award R&D for specific technologies and one of its aims is to promote the commercialization of promising energy technologies.

Can you give example impact measures that will distinguish proposals (given broad range of tech...)

The criteria that will be used to assess the impact of the proposed energy projects are described in section 5.6 (page 20) of the rules document, which also provides examples of impact. These include providing economic, health, environmental, or other benefits to the community and first-of-a-kind application, replicability, or novel lessons learned for the technology.

So, prize funds don't fall under any 2 CFR 200 regulations?

Correct. Prizes are not considered a procurement under the Federal Acquisitions Regulations and will not result in a grant or cooperative agreement under 2 CFR 200. 

Can you give some examples of strategic communities suitable for the program?

Disadvantaged, underserved, or overburdened communities are of particular interest for this prize. See Section 1.4 of the official rules document for further description of these communities.

Can the solution be an existing designed Leed platinum structure for use within a community that is seeking funding to be built?

Competitors are encouraged to share their project ideas with Power Connectors for further discussion, as the Prize Administration Team cannot weigh in on project specifics.

What does community-scale like neighborhood entail?  Such as does renewable energy system installation and operation on community college or university campus(es) considered community scale?

The target community must be defined by the competitor, along with the challenges or opportunities that community faces.

What if you are an impartial party that was appointed to project manage all the community partners? Does that have a negative impact?

Competitors should describe their experience with and role in previous work with communities in their submissions. Competitors are welcome to discuss the specifics of their own situations and experience with Power Connectors. 

Are there quarterly reporting requirements associated with receiving a prize?

No, prize awards may be used however the winner chooses.

Our community issue is an Energy Cooperative that services a middle class community in the U.S., they are wondering how to drive solar adoption for the community in a sustainable and honest way, is this a good fit for the prize, or is the focus more for low-income communities?

Competitors are encouraged to share their project ideas with Power Connectors for further discussion, as the Prize Administration Team cannot weigh in on project specifics.

Does the technology project (in Phase 3) need to be demonstration in nature? Can it be facilitative work (like testing/validation) to make progress towards a larger community project?

Communities are welcome to pursue a variety of types of clean energy projects, so long as they meet the goals of the prize, including addressing a community’s unique needs and challenges.  Note that the impact of the project, including the potential benefit of the project for the community, are included in the assessment criteria.

That 2,000 words, is that per category or overall?

The total narrative document must not exceed 2,000 words.

The 2,000-word limit is for proposal, right? Not including letters of recommendation or other supporting docs?

The 2,000-word limit is for the submission narrative and does not include other components of the submission package

Are there any guidelines to prepare the papers?

Competitors are encouraged to closely read the official rules document for guidance of prize objectives and submission content.

With the DE&I aspect of this prize, is the team aware of workarounds for states with anti-DE&I bills? I’m concerned with being able to satisfy state law and submission guidelines.

Competitors should ensure that their submissions comply with all local, state, and federal laws. Each submission is assessed on multiple criteria as well as other factors, all of which are described in the rules.

Can this funding be used with other federal government monies (Inflation Reduction Act, for example)?

Yes, this is a cash prize award with no reporting requirements.

Are there any limitations to the number of proposals submitted by a team?

A single entity or individual may only submit one application as the lead competitor to this prize. Entities may participate as part of a team on multiple applications.

My team had previously entered the HeroX Community Energy Innovation prize contest. Can I use the same material used previously?

Competitors should ensure that their materials align with the stated prize goals of each competition to which they submit, but may draw from previously prepared materials as is useful.

Given this is a prize, does the breakdown of price estimating for pieces of the project need to be included with application?

Phase 3 includes a budget requirement for the specified clean energy project as part of the submission, and competitors can include any prize funds into their budget depending on their specific situations.

Why is short-duration ESS excluded from the list, while solar and long-duration ESS are included? Will projects incorporating 4hr ESS be considered?

 The prize team cannot advise on specific determinations of eligibility. Section 1.4 Areas of Interest section includes broad descriptions of the eligible technologies. Each eligible technology includes a link in the footnotes where competitors can learn more about the technology and specifics of what might be considered within the purview of that technology.

Would groups have to have an already developed prototype if they plan on submitting a technological innovation or are blueprints acceptable?

The SOLVE IT prize aims to support communities as they identify and implement innovative solutions in a way that addresses their unique needs and challenges. The prize is not intended to support R&D. Competitors should ensure that their submissions align with the goals of the prize.